The Sunshine list and wealth disparity

As stolen from thevarsity.ca
Every year the entire province loses its collective minds over the Sunshine List. Mike Harris started this yearly denigration-fest of public servants in 1996 and since then other provinces have followed suit. The idea was to publish the names and occupations of everyone who made over $100000 a year from the public coffers. It kept with Harris’ goal to slash and privatize as much of Ontario’s social services as possible and so naming and shaming was part of the propaganda process of that endeavour.
So for the past 30 years the Sunshine List has been a mainstay in Ontario political drama and quite frankly, it’s absolutely bonkers to me. The glaringly obvious issue of privacy aside[1], that $100000 threshold hasn’t changed in 30 years. Meanwhile, the BoC inflation calculator says your would need almost $188300 to buy the same amount of stuff that $100000 would buy you in 1996. In Toronto – where most of these high salaries are concentrated – the average price of a home was $198000 in 1996 compared to $1.5 million at the end of 2025. So to put it another way, even if you and your partner both cleared the Sunshine List with a combined income of $200000 and had no debt AND you had a 20% down payment, you probably still couldn’t afford to own a house in Toronto[2]. In my city, the average price is $886000, which would still leave a couple short about $8000 to purchase a home. $100000 just ain’t what it used to be!
I don’t want to leave anyone with the impression that I *don’t* think $100000 is a good salary – because it is! It’s just interesting to compare it to what that money will buy you now in 2026. If we don’t look at things in context, we miss the point completely. It’s also worth noting that in 1996 the minimum wage was $6.45/h and now it is $17.60/h. So the jump from a $12578 yearly salary to a $34320 salary is more than double in 30 years. Also, that makes the Sunshine List even more out of touch as it used to be almost 8x a minimum wage salary and now it’s more like 2.9x. We can argue that the current minimum wage is still untenable in most major cities but still, that disparity is telling.
Speaking of disparity, I came across this NYT article aptly titled, “How Can America Be So Miserable When It’s So Rich?” and it basically reflected back to me something I’ve been thinking for awhile. People love to throw around how some countries in Europe are on par with the poorest of US states and how Canada has the same economy as Alabama’s. GDP is a terrible measure of the health of an economy when most of the money is flowing upwards to the richest members of a society. That is why Kyla Scanlon’s Vibecession caught on: people feel poorer. They feel poorer because 49.7% of all spending is done by the top 10% of people in the US. So naturally the economy swings to cater to the needs and whims of those folks.
One of the reasons I think nostalgia has been such a hot political button to push is because people are nostalgic for when wealth was more concentrated in the middle and there were less extremes. Add this to the absolute gong show known as social media where you can follow a DITL of a Saudi Prince or a Super Model in unlimited reels constantly streamed straight to your brain and you are going to feel, well, a little poor. We used to compare ourselves to our neighbours, not we compare ourselves to everyone in the world. No wonder we feel miserable.
When my friend Judy told me she was moving to Canada and wondered if her new salary would be good to live on, I told her yes. Even though she currently makes what we would think is a great salary, she also currently lives in an area with a lot of ridiculously rich people. When she moves, things will be similarly expensive compared to what she makes but the wealth disparity will be less. We don’t have the kinds of extreme wealth that the Bay area does and many salaries are clustered around the middle. Yes, day-to-day things will be more expensive but houses won’t cost $10M and even though my friends earn wildly different salaries, we all have access to a pretty decent life and social infrastructure. Besides, she isn’t a person who is prone to social comparison and overspending. I think that she’ll adjust more to the financials than she will the winters.
This isn’t to say that there aren’t legitimate concerns about wealth disparity and there will always be folks on either end of the economic spectrum. But looking for scapegoats for political clout in the doctor who runs a major hospital in a large urban area ain’t it. Hilariously, it looks like it’s come back to bite them in the arse: Doug Ford got himself a sweet $60K+ raise last year and his daughter has seen her salary grow more than 34% as well, which is pretty great for someone without the education and the experience for that position. Oops!
[1] PRO TIP: Public Servants don’t actually have a right to privacy, which is interesting in itself. You could theoretically create an ATIP request for the entire contents of someone’s email. Remember kids, delete all non-business related email daily!
[2] $1.5M – $300000 = $1.2M purchase price. Banks generally will finance 3.5X your salary, minus your debts. So our theoretical couple could only finance $700000.




